In 2015, we reported reversal of anti-VEGF drug tolerance in eyes with wet AMD using panmacular SDM. This was the first — and as yet, only — report of reversal of drug tolerance in the history of medicine, clinically or in the lab. In this study, we described the “reset to default” theory of retinal laser action that we used to predict that SDM would reverse drug tolerance. Luttrull JK, Chang DB, Margolis BWL, Dorin G, Luttrull DK. Laser re-sensitization of medically unresponsive neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Efficacy and implications. Retina 2015 Jun; 35(6): 1184-1194.
This powerful confirmation of the reset theory led to several other studies, ultimately demonstrating the effectiveness of regular periodic panmacular SDM (Vision Protection Therapy) at preventing neovascular conversion in AMD. Read on to learn more about these promising studies on the efficacy of Vision Protection Therapy for the prevention of vision loss from AMD.
In 2016, 158 eyes of 108 consecutive patients with dry AMD were reported, tested by various methods after panmacular subthreshold diode micropulse (SDM) treatment. Luttrull JK, Margolis BWL. Functionally guided retinal protective therapy as prophylaxis for age-related and inherited retinal degenerations. A pilot study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jan 1;5 7(1):265-75. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18163
SDM is a specific application of MPL that uses a uniform treatment in all eyes, including identical laser parameters, treatment area (panmacular), and number of laser spot applications. Laser parameters are chosen to achieve effective treatment while precluding the possibility of laser-induced retinal damage (LIRD). Thus, there are no reports of adverse treatment effects or LIRD by any means of detection following SDM. There was no notable effect of treatment on macular morphology or drusen.
Following SDM MPL, retinal function measured by pattern electroretinography (PERG) was significantly improved (p=0.0001); and visual function improved by microperimetry (P=0.0439) and contrast acuity (p=0.006). These findings suggested that functional testing combined with SDM MPL, sublethal to the retina, by improving retinal and visual function and thus reversing disease progression, might serve as a useful surrogate indicator of long-term slowed disease progression and reduced risks of vision loss.
In 2018, the effect of SDM MPL on the incidence of neovascular conversion in eyes with dry AMD was reported.
Luttrull JK, Sinclair SH, Elmann S, Glaser BM. Low incidence of choroidal neovascularization following subthreshold diode micropulse laser (SDM) for high-risk AMD. PLoS ONE 2018 13(8): e0202097. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0202097.
This retrospective study examined all eyes with dry AMD in a vitreoretinal practice in which regular periodic panmacular SDM (Vision Protection Therapy) was offered in addition to conventional care to try to slow disease progression and reduce vision loss. This study included 547 eyes of 363 patients treated between 2008 and 2017. Risk factors in this patient cohort were especially high, with an average age of 84 years, RPD in 39%, fellow eye CNV in 23%, and AREDS category 3 and 4 AMD in 78%. Despite these high risks, with follow up ranging from 6-108 months (avg. 22), new CNV developed in 9/547 eyes (1.6%, annualized rate 0.87%), and age-adjusted reduction in the expected incidence of new CNV of between 95-98%. Patients suffering neovascular conversion average 82 years with an average AREDS category in the treated eye of 3.2 and fellow eye of 3.7. 5/9 converting eyes had NAMD in the fellow eye. 8/9 had RPD in both eyes. Neither smoking nor systemic hypertension were risk factors for conversion, likely due to the small number of conversions observed. Over the study period there was no notable effect of treatment on macular drusen.
The effect of SDM on progression of GA was then studied, examining the eyes with GA in this same cohort of eyes with AMD treated by regular periodic SDM. (78) 67 eyes of 49 patients with GA were identified for study, documented an average 2.5 years prior to initial SDM treatment, and an average 2.2 years after beginning SDM every 3-4 months. These were high-risk eyes — the same type that worsened following SRT and 2RT nanosecond laser treatment. The average age of this group was 86 years old. 78% of eyes had coincident RPD.
Reported in 2020, the rate of radial GA progression slowed after SDM treatment from an average annual rate of 137um to 73um per year, a 47% per year decline in annual progression rate. There was no LIRD or adverse treatment effects. GA lesions with a diameter of <1000um at the time of first treatment slowed nearly twice the average rate, although this difference was not statistically significant due to the small number of eyes.
However, this observation suggests that — as one might expect — with GA, less advanced disease may respond better to treatment than more advanced disease.
Luttrull JK, Sinclair SH, Elmann S, Chang DB, Kent D. Slowed progression of age-related geographic atrophy following subthreshold laser. Clin Ophthalmol (2020) Oct 1;14:2983-2993.
A retrospective study of the results of a novel procedure in a single practice, especially one that reports remarkable results, should be taken with caution.The potential for various biases is high. Mitigating factors were the all-comers nature of the study cohort, excellent long-term follow up, uniform nature of the treatment, and robust binary results . To challenge the results of the first study showing an age-adjusted reduction in the expected incidence of new CNV in AMD by 95-98% per year in a very high-risk population, a second study was performed.
In this study, the effect of regular periodic panmacular SDM (“vision protection therapy”, or VPT) on neovascular conversion in dry AMD was examined using real world data (RWD). Vestrum Health, Inc (Naperville, Ill, USA) (VH) aggregates patient unidentified data from over 300 retina practices in the United States. Member practices are provided monthly benchmarking reports and given access to the database for analyses. All eyes in the VH database with ICD 9 and 10 codes for dry AMD between January 2016 and September 2021 were examined. Inclusions included, in addition to dry AMD, age of 50 years or more. The comparator was whether they were treated with standard care alone (SCA) (AREDS vitamins, hypertension control, smoking cessation and healthy lifestyle and nutritional advice) vs the addition of VPT to standard care. Exclusions were various diagnoses that may require intravitreal injection such as diabetes mellitus and retinal vascular occlusion, and diagnoses that predispose to CNV, such as prior macular photocoagulation, high or degenerative myopia and ocular histoplasmosis.
Because data included ICD 9 coding which did not stratify AMD beyond wet or dry, dry AMD subtyping could not be performed. Patients were then matched by propensity scoring for identifiable risk factors, including age, sex, systemic hypertension, smoking and use of AREDS vitamins. Patients were also matched for the number of clinical encounters, as a clinical encounter was required to identify and make the diagnosis of conversion, and thus represented an independent risk factor. Confirmation of neovascular conversion required both a new ICD 9 or 10 diagnosis of neovascular AMD and initiation of anti-VEGF therapy. Using the Match-it program, the study groups were matched in a 1/10 ratio for statistical analysis with 830 eyes in the VPT group, and 8,300 in the SCA group for a total study group of 9,130 eyes.
Over the 4.75 year study window, eyes receiving VPT in addition to standard care were significantly less likely to suffer neovascular conversion than eyes managed by SCA (Hazard ratio 13.04). Over the same period, the average VA of VPT eyes improved, while the VA of SCA eyes progressively worsened.
The effect of VPT on management of eyes already being treated with anti-VEGF injections for neovascular AMD was also examined. Compared to eyes managed with injections alone, eyes that received VPT in addition to anti-VEGF injections required 69% fewer injections to achieve the same visual results. Luttrull JK, Gray G. Prevention of neovascular AMD: Real world efficacy of program of panmacular laser for vision protection. Researchgate.net (2021). Online preprint: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349952308_Prevention_of_neovascular_AMD_Real_world_efficacy_of_program_of_panmacular_laser_for_vision_protection
Finally, a newer 2022 RWD study, currently in manuscript, included ICD 10 code matching for dry AMD subtypes, matching over 7,300 patients for all AMD risk factors, and confirms the prior RWD study. This 2022 study shows Vision Protection Therapy is markedly superior to standard care with AREDS vitamins alone.
The preponderance of evidence that Vision Protection Therapy is effective in the treatment of AMD is a result of decades of clinical and scientific research, and our understanding of its healing, restorative properties grows by the day. Dr. Luttrull and his colleagues continue to study and report promising findings providing that SMD therapy can “turn back the clock” on AMD. We encourage you to check back regularly for exciting updates on this groundbreaking development in retinal health.
* Individual results may vary, testimonials are not claimed to represent typical results. All testimonials are from real patients, but are not intended to represent or guarantee that anyone will achieve the same or similar results.
All Rights Reserved | Vision Protection